Yes, that's expected??nd dangerous. Once you call `delete` on a pointer, the memory it pointed to is deallocated, but the pointer itself still holds the old (now invalid) address. Dereferencing it results in undefined behavior, commonly manifesting as a segmentation fault. To avoid this: 1. **Set the pointer to `nullptr` immediately after `delete`** ??dereferencing `nullptr` will crash predictably (often with a clear null-pointer exception in debug builds), making bugs easier to spot. 2. **Prefer smart pointers** like `std::unique_ptr` or `std::shared_ptr`, which automatically manage lifetime and prevent use-after-free by design. 3. **Use static analysis tools** (e.g., AddressSanitizer with `-fsanitize=address`) to catch these issues during testing. Also, avoid raw `new`/`delete` unless you have a specific low-level need??odern C++ strongly encourages RAII and smart pointers for safety and clarity.

Yes, that?? not only normal??t?? a classic sign you??e engaging deeply with existential thought. Thinkers like Kierkegaard called this 'the dizziness of freedom,' and Rollo May described it as the natural discomfort that arises when we confront our radical responsibility. The anxiety isn?? a bug??t?? a feature: it signals that you??e no longer outsourcing meaning to external authorities (religion, tradition, social expectations) and are beginning to author your own values. Many find grounding through what Irvin Yalom calls 'existential givens'??eath, freedom, isolation, and meaninglessness??ot by solving them, but by responding authentically: committing to relationships, creative work, or causes *despite* uncertainty. It helps to reframe 'meaninglessness' not as a void, but as open space??ike a blank canvas rather than an erased one.